<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sunshine Review Blog &#187; Sunshine Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunshinereviewblog.com/tag/sunshine-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunshinereviewblog.com</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of the Sunshine Review Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:37:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Audit finds 59 violations of Missouri&#8217;s Sunshine Law</title>
		<link>http://sunshinereviewblog.com/2010/06/03/audit-finds-59-violations-of-missouris-sunshine-law/</link>
		<comments>http://sunshinereviewblog.com/2010/06/03/audit-finds-59-violations-of-missouris-sunshine-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristinpedia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunshine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sunshinereviewblog.com/?p=2499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes people ask how we came to our transparency checklist items, and we&#8217;re always pretty surprised because we think they are self evident (however you can find the full rational here). I find this especially true for are audits. Recently, Missouri&#8217;s auditor found out that there had been 59 Sunshine Law compliance problem between 2008 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsunshinereviewblog.com%2F2010%2F06%2F03%2Faudit-finds-59-violations-of-missouris-sunshine-law%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsunshinereviewblog.com%2F2010%2F06%2F03%2Faudit-finds-59-violations-of-missouris-sunshine-law%2F&amp;source=sunshinereview&amp;style=normal&amp;space=10&amp;hashtags=Audit,Missouri,Sunshine+Law&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Sometimes people ask how we came to our transparency checklist items, and we&#8217;re always pretty surprised because we think they are self evident (however you can find the full rational <a href="http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Transparency_checklist">here</a>).  I find this especially true for are audits.  </p>
<p>Recently, Missouri&#8217;s auditor found out that there had been 59 <a href="http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Missouri_Sunshine_Law">Sunshine Law</a> compliance problem between 2008 and 2009. Over 45 governmental bodies were reported having issues with meeting minutes and agendas; 30 reported problems with minutes for closed meetings; and 18 failed to provide justification for a closed meetings.</p>
<p>Have you seen this type of thing in your state?  What&#8217;s the juiciest scandal your auditor has found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunshinereviewblog.com/2010/06/03/audit-finds-59-violations-of-missouris-sunshine-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

